Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: proc: use __seq_open_private()

From: Rob Jones
Date: Mon Sep 29 2014 - 12:02:23 EST



On 12/09/14 22:54, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:09:37 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Reduce boilerplate code by using __seq_open_private() instead of seq_open().

http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fs-proc-task_nommuc-change-maps_open-to-use-__seq_open_private.patch
already did this.

This duplicated only half of my submission, patch 2/2 did a similar
operation on a different file (fs/proc/task_mmu.c).

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/12/347

Is that one actually going in (with Andrew's rename to include the file
name) or should I resubmit it on its own?

--
Rob Jones
Codethink Ltd
mailto:rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel:+44 161 236 5575
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/