[PATCH 3.12 028/142] svcrdma: Select NFSv4.1 backchannel transport based on forward channel

From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Fri Sep 26 2014 - 06:34:21 EST


From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>

3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 3c45ddf823d679a820adddd53b52c6699c9a05ac upstream.

The current code always selects XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC_TCP for the back
channel, even when the forward channel was not TCP (eg, RDMA). When
a 4.1 mount is attempted with RDMA, the server panics in the TCP BC
code when trying to send CB_NULL.

Instead, construct the transport protocol number from the forward
channel transport or'd with XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC. Transports that do
not support bi-directional RPC will not have registered a "BC"
transport, causing create_backchannel_client() to fail immediately.

Fixes: https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c | 3 ++-
include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h | 1 +
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 2 ++
net/sunrpc/xprt.c | 2 +-
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
index 3eaa6e30a2dc..cc8c5b32043c 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
@@ -672,7 +672,8 @@ static int setup_callback_client(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct nfs4_cb_conn *c
clp->cl_cb_session = ses;
args.bc_xprt = conn->cb_xprt;
args.prognumber = clp->cl_cb_session->se_cb_prog;
- args.protocol = XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC_TCP;
+ args.protocol = conn->cb_xprt->xpt_class->xcl_ident |
+ XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC;
args.authflavor = ses->se_cb_sec.flavor;
}
/* Create RPC client */
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
index b05963f09ebf..f5bfb1a80abe 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct svc_xprt_class {
struct svc_xprt_ops *xcl_ops;
struct list_head xcl_list;
u32 xcl_max_payload;
+ int xcl_ident;
};

/*
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 6ac0f1c3fc28..8c6e9c75c525 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -683,6 +683,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_class svc_udp_class = {
.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
.xcl_ops = &svc_udp_ops,
.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_UDP,
+ .xcl_ident = XPRT_TRANSPORT_UDP,
};

static void svc_udp_init(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_serv *serv)
@@ -1277,6 +1278,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_class svc_tcp_class = {
.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
.xcl_ops = &svc_tcp_ops,
.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
+ .xcl_ident = XPRT_TRANSPORT_TCP,
};

void svc_init_xprt_sock(void)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
index 095363eee764..42ce6bfc729d 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
@@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ struct rpc_xprt *xprt_create_transport(struct xprt_create *args)
}
}
spin_unlock(&xprt_list_lock);
- printk(KERN_ERR "RPC: transport (%d) not supported\n", args->ident);
+ dprintk("RPC: transport (%d) not supported\n", args->ident);
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);

found:
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
index 62e4f9bcc387..ed36cb52cd86 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct svc_xprt_class svc_rdma_class = {
.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
.xcl_ops = &svc_rdma_ops,
.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
+ .xcl_ident = XPRT_TRANSPORT_RDMA,
};

struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt *svc_rdma_get_context(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt)
--
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/