Re: [PATCH] blk-merge: fix blk_recount_segments

[Rusty Russell]

Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:24:24 -0600
> Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 09/02/2014 10:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > Btw, one thing we should reconsider is where we set
>> > QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE.  At least for virtio-blk it seems to me that
>> > doing the S/G merge should be a lot cheaper than fanning out into the
>> > indirect descriptors.
>
> Indirect is always considered first no matter SG merge is off or on,
> at least from current virtio-blk implementation.
>
> But it is a good idea to try direct descriptor first, the below simple
> change can improve randread(libaio, O_DIRECT, multi-queue) 7% in my test,
> and 77% transfer starts to use direct descriptor, and almost all transfer
> uses indirect descriptor only in current upstream implementation.

Hi Ming!

        In general, we want to use direct descriptors of we have plenty
of descriptors, and indirect if the ring is going to fill up.  I was
thinking about this just yesterday, in fact.

I've been trying to use EWMA to figure out how full the ring gets, but
so far it's not working well.  I'm still hacking on a solution though,
and your thoughts would be welcome.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/