Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio)

[Mike Galbraith]

On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:04 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: 
> > NAK.  There it is, my imaginary NAK to imaginary realtime priorities :)
> 
> Ok, but do you have any alternative proposal yourself how to solve the
> lockholder preemption problem? I assume you agree it's a real problem.
> 
> Just being negative is not very constructive.

I both acknowledged the problem problem, and made alternative
suggestions.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/