Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: Fix handling packets on compound pages with skb_segment

From: Wei Liu
Date: Sun Aug 03 2014 - 05:11:41 EST


On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 03:33:37PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:02:46 +0100
>
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:25:20PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> If you were to have a 64-slot TX queue, you ought to be able to handle
> >> this theoretical 51 slot SKB.
> >
> > There's two problems:
> > 1. IIRC a single page ring has 256 slots, allowing 64 slots packet
> > yields 4 in-flight packets in worst case.
> > 2. Older netback could not handle this large number of slots and it's
> > likely to deem the frontend malicious.
> >
> > For #1, we don't actually care that much if guest screws itself by
> > generating 64 slot packets. #2 is more concerning.
>
> How many slots can the older netback handle?

I listed those two problems in the context "if we were to lift this
limit in the latest net-next tree", so "older netback" actually refers
to netback from 3.10 to 3.16.

The current implementation allows the number of slots X:
1. X <= 18, valid packet
2. 18 < X < fatal_slot_count, dropped
3. X >= fatal_slot_count, malicious frontend

fatal_slot_count has default value of 20.

Wei.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/