Re: [PATCH 05/41] perf tools: Identify which comms are from exec

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:07:52AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 02:43:08PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > >> @@ -106,6 +107,8 @@ int comm__override(struct comm *comm, const char *str, u64 timestamp)
> > >>  	comm_str__put(old);
> > >>  	comm->comm_str = new;
> > >>  	comm->start = timestamp;
> > >> +	if (exec && !comm->exec)
> > >> +		comm->exec = true;
> 
> > > Why do you need the !comm->exec test?
>  
> > Dunno
> 
> I saw that you kept it in the last patchkit submitted, I'll just drop
> it, needless obfuscation.

Also why do you need to "identify which comms are from exec", was it
good for?

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/