Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex

[Waiman Long]

On 07/21/2014 12:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Andi Kleen<andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  writes:
>
> > Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>  writes:
> >
> > > This patch series introduces two new futex command codes to support
> > > a new optimistic spinning futex for implementing an exclusive lock
> > > primitive that should perform better than the same primitive using
> > > the wait-wake futex in cases where the lock owner is actively working
> > > instead of waiting for I/O completion.
> > How would you distinguish those two cases automatically?
> Also BTW traditionally the spinning was just done in user space.
>
> This would be always even more efficient, because it would
> even avoid the syscall entry path.

Spinning directly in userspace is useful if the critical section is 
really short and the chance of heavy contention is small. However, if 
the lock can be heavily contended and the critical section is not short, 
these are the conditions where a spinning futex proposed by this patch 
series can help.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/