Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Don't mark DataLA addresses as store

[Stephane Eranian]

On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> I have a problem with this patch.
>> >>
>> >> It makes: perf mem -t store rec record OP_NA for the store.
>> >> It was recording OP_STORE before.
>> >>
>> >> I think we need to keep LD/ST info. This is useful for analysis
>> >> especially if we collect loads/stores simultaneously.
>> >>
>> >> Was working before for the mem-loads, mem-stores events.
>> >
>> > Ok. Would it be enough if it only worked for "mem-stores" and not
>> > all PEBS events?
>> >
>> Ok, do that at a minimum.
>
> I fixed it now. However it turned out that "perf mem report"
> actually not report mem_op, only mem_lvl.
>
> You may want to fix that separately.
>
It is because it currently record loads or store but not both simultaneously.
Once I allow load/store in a single run, it will print the mem_op.

> -Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/