Re: [PATCH v2 12/29] nios2: Interrupt handling

[Ley Foon Tan]

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 July 2014 16:45:39 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>> +#ifndef _ASM_NIOS2_IRQ_H
>> +#define _ASM_NIOS2_IRQ_H
>> +
>> +#define NIOS2_CPU_NR_IRQS    32
>> +/* Reserve 32 additional interrupts for GPIO IRQs */
>> +#define NR_IRQS                      (NIOS2_CPU_NR_IRQS + 32)
>
> Is this intentional? I would expect that you use SPARSE_IRQ
> instead and not define NR_IRQS.
Okay, will change to use SPARSE_IRQ.
>
>> +#ifndef NO_IRQ
>> +#define NO_IRQ                       (-1)
>> +#endif
>
> New architectures should no longer define NO_IRQ. Please fix all users
> you encounter instead.
Okay.

>
>> diff --git a/arch/nios2/kernel/irq.c b/arch/nios2/kernel/irq.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..8770d50
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/nios2/kernel/irq.c
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> Maybe move this into drivers/irqchip/? Probably doesn't matter either way,
> your choice.
Will keep it here.
BTW, this interrupt controller is part of Nios2 cpu architecture.
Should we move to drivers/irqchip/ if that's the case? Any example of
arch doing this?
Thanks.

Regards
Ley Foon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/