Re: [PATCH RT 0/3] Linux 3.10.47-rt50-rc1

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:31:17 -0500
Corey Minyard <cminyard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 
> I originally did a patch that just always did the else clause (the
> schedule_work_on() and wait_for_completion()) on all CPUs.  That seemed
> to work just fine and simplifies the code a bit and gets rid of all the
> preempt/migrate calls.  You could try that approach, or I could submit
> something if you liked.

Yeah, perhaps that's the way to go. But it needs to go to mainline
before it goes to -rt.

Can you resend it against my for-next branch.

Thanks,

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/