Re: [PATCH] ARM: mm: fix the boundary checking on bitmaps

From: Marek Szyprowski
Date: Mon Jul 14 2014 - 09:03:02 EST


Hello,

On 2014-07-10 04:28, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
The issue of boundary checking on bitmaps is introduced by this commit
in below.

commit 4d852ef8c2544ce21ae41414099a7504c61164a0
Author: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Feb 25 13:09:53 2014 +0100

arm: dma-mapping: Add support to extend DMA IOMMU mappings

Multiple bitmaps were introduced as extension. If it needs to extend
a bitmap, it still check whether the allocation exceeding the total
size, not current bitmap size. So change the condition from
mapping->bits to PAGE_SIZE.

Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx>

NACK, this patch is not correct. mapping->bits contains the correct size of
a single bitmap, see the beginning of arm_iommu_create_mapping() function.

---
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 4c88935..d7da5c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -1089,9 +1089,9 @@ static inline dma_addr_t __alloc_iova(struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping,
spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < mapping->nr_bitmaps; i++) {
start = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(mapping->bitmaps[i],
- mapping->bits, 0, count, align);
+ PAGE_SIZE, 0, count, align);
- if (start > mapping->bits)
+ if (start > PAGE_SIZE)
continue;
bitmap_set(mapping->bitmaps[i], start, count);
@@ -1110,9 +1110,9 @@ static inline dma_addr_t __alloc_iova(struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping,
}
start = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(mapping->bitmaps[i],
- mapping->bits, 0, count, align);
+ PAGE_SIZE, 0, count, align);
- if (start > mapping->bits) {
+ if (start > PAGE_SIZE) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->lock, flags);
return DMA_ERROR_CODE;
}

Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/