[PATCH] bnx2fc: Improve stats update mechanism

From: Neil Horman
Date: Mon Jun 23 2014 - 10:41:24 EST


Recently had this warning reported:

[ 290.489047] Call Trace:
[ 290.489053] [<ffffffff8169efec>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[ 290.489055] [<ffffffff810ac7a9>] __might_sleep+0x179/0x230
[ 290.489057] [<ffffffff816a4ad5>] mutex_lock_nested+0x55/0x520
[ 290.489061] [<ffffffffa01b9905>] ? bnx2fc_l2_rcv_thread+0xc5/0x4c0 [bnx2fc]
[ 290.489065] [<ffffffffa0174c1a>] fc_vport_id_lookup+0x3a/0xa0 [libfc]
[ 290.489068] [<ffffffffa01b9a6c>] bnx2fc_l2_rcv_thread+0x22c/0x4c0 [bnx2fc]
[ 290.489070] [<ffffffffa01b9840>] ? bnx2fc_vport_destroy+0x110/0x110 [bnx2fc]
[ 290.489073] [<ffffffff8109e0cd>] kthread+0xed/0x100
[ 290.489075] [<ffffffff8109dfe0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80
[ 290.489077] [<ffffffff816b2fec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 290.489078] [<ffffffff8109dfe0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80

Its due to the fact that we call a potentially sleeping function from the bnx2fc
rcv path with preemption disabled (via the get_cpu call embedded in the per-cpu
variable stats lookup in bnx2fc_l2_rcv_thread.

Easy enough fix, we can just move the stats collection later in the function
where we are sure we won't preempt or sleep. This also allows us to not have to
enable pre-emption when doing a per-cpu lookup, since we're certain not to get
rescheduled.

Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c | 16 ++++------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
index 9b94850..475eee5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
@@ -516,23 +516,17 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(struct fcoe_hdr));
fr_len = skb->len - sizeof(struct fcoe_crc_eof);

- stats = per_cpu_ptr(lport->stats, get_cpu());
- stats->RxFrames++;
- stats->RxWords += fr_len / FCOE_WORD_TO_BYTE;
-
fp = (struct fc_frame *)skb;
fc_frame_init(fp);
fr_dev(fp) = lport;
fr_sof(fp) = hp->fcoe_sof;
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, fr_len, &crc_eof, sizeof(crc_eof))) {
- put_cpu();
kfree_skb(skb);
return;
}
fr_eof(fp) = crc_eof.fcoe_eof;
fr_crc(fp) = crc_eof.fcoe_crc32;
if (pskb_trim(skb, fr_len)) {
- put_cpu();
kfree_skb(skb);
return;
}
@@ -544,7 +538,6 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
port = lport_priv(vn_port);
if (!ether_addr_equal(port->data_src_addr, dest_mac)) {
BNX2FC_HBA_DBG(lport, "fpma mismatch\n");
- put_cpu();
kfree_skb(skb);
return;
}
@@ -552,7 +545,6 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
if (fh->fh_r_ctl == FC_RCTL_DD_SOL_DATA &&
fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_FCP) {
/* Drop FCP data. We dont this in L2 path */
- put_cpu();
kfree_skb(skb);
return;
}
@@ -562,7 +554,6 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
case ELS_LOGO:
if (ntoh24(fh->fh_s_id) == FC_FID_FLOGI) {
/* drop non-FIP LOGO */
- put_cpu();
kfree_skb(skb);
return;
}
@@ -572,22 +563,23 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)

if (fh->fh_r_ctl == FC_RCTL_BA_ABTS) {
/* Drop incoming ABTS */
- put_cpu();
kfree_skb(skb);
return;
}

+ stats = per_cpu_ptr(lport->stats, smp_processor_id());
+ stats->RxFrames++;
+ stats->RxWords += fr_len / FCOE_WORD_TO_BYTE;
+
if (le32_to_cpu(fr_crc(fp)) !=
~crc32(~0, skb->data, fr_len)) {
if (stats->InvalidCRCCount < 5)
printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "dropping frame with "
"CRC error\n");
stats->InvalidCRCCount++;
- put_cpu();
kfree_skb(skb);
return;
}
- put_cpu();
fc_exch_recv(lport, fp);
}

--
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/