Re: [PATCH] clocksource: exynos-mct: Register the timer for stable udelay

From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Thu Jun 19 2014 - 05:08:06 EST


On 06/19/2014 01:17 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Amit,

Thanks for posting!

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
<amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This patch register the exynos mct clocksource as the current timer
as it has constant clock rate. This will generate correct udelay for the
exynos platform and avoid using unnecessary calibrated jiffies. This change
have been tested on exynos5420 based board.

Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Patches from David Riley confirmed that udelay is broken in exynos5420.
Link to those patches are,
1) https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4344911/
2) https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4344881/

drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
index 8d64200..57cb3dc 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
@@ -198,10 +198,21 @@ static u64 notrace exynos4_read_sched_clock(void)
return exynos4_frc_read(&mct_frc);
}

+static struct delay_timer exynos4_delay_timer;
+
+static unsigned long exynos4_read_current_timer(void)
+{
+ return exynos4_frc_read(&mct_frc);

This is terribly inefficient to read all 64-bits and then cast back to
a 32-bit value. Replace with:

return __raw_readl(reg_base + EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_L);


+}
+
static void __init exynos4_clocksource_init(void)
{
exynos4_mct_frc_start(0, 0);

Please rebase atop (1d80415 clocksource: exynos_mct: Don't reset the
counter during boot and resume), which is in linuxnext among other
places.


+ exynos4_delay_timer.read_current_timer = &exynos4_read_current_timer;
+ exynos4_delay_timer.freq = clk_rate;
+ register_current_timer_delay(&exynos4_delay_timer);
+
if (clocksource_register_hz(&mct_frc, clk_rate))
panic("%s: can't register clocksource\n", mct_frc.name);

It does seem to work for me though. :)

Doug,

aren't you working on a 32 bits version ? So this patch could be simplified ?

Thanks
-- Daniel


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/