Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] DMA, CMA: clean-up log message

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:18:53PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Joonsoo,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:21:38PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
> > 'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
> > 
> > And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
> > bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently.
> > 
> > Lastly, I add one more debug log on cma_activate_area().
> 
> When I take a look, it just indicates cma_activate_area was called or not,
> without what range for the area was reserved successfully so I couldn't see
> the intention for new message. Description should explain it so that everybody
> can agree on your claim.
> 

Hello,

I paste the answer in other thread.

This pr_debug() comes from ppc kvm's kvm_cma_init_reserved_areas().
I want to maintain all log messages as much as possible to reduce
confusion with this generalization.

If I need to respin this patchset, I will explain more about it.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/