Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: Allow hard guarantee mode for low limit reclaim

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Michal.

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Is this the kind of symmetry Tejun is asking for and that would make
> change is Nack position? I am still not sure it satisfies his soft

Yes, pretty much.  What primarily bothered me was the soft/hard
guarantees being chosen by a toggle switch while the soft/hard limits
can be configured separately and combined.

> guarantee objections from other email.

I was wondering about the usefulness of "low" itself in isolation and
I still think it'd be less useful than "high", but as there seem to be
use cases which can be served with that and especially as a part of a
consistent control scheme, I have no objection.

"low" definitely requires a notification mechanism tho.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/