[PATCH 3.14 67/78] intel_pstate: Improve initial busy calculation

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@xxxxxxxxx>

commit bf8102228a8bf053051f311e5486042fe0542894 upstream.

This change makes the busy calculation using 64 bit math which prevents
overflow for large values of aperf/mperf.

Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -563,16 +563,19 @@ static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates
 static inline void intel_pstate_calc_busy(struct cpudata *cpu,
 					struct sample *sample)
 {
-	int32_t core_pct;
+	int64_t core_pct;
+	int32_t rem;
 
-	core_pct = div_fp(int_tofp((sample->aperf)),
-			int_tofp((sample->mperf)));
-	core_pct = mul_fp(core_pct, int_tofp(100));
+	core_pct = int_tofp(sample->aperf) * int_tofp(100);
+	core_pct = div_u64_rem(core_pct, int_tofp(sample->mperf), &rem);
+
+	if ((rem << 1) >= int_tofp(sample->mperf))
+		core_pct += 1;
 
 	sample->freq = fp_toint(
 		mul_fp(int_tofp(cpu->pstate.max_pstate * 1000), core_pct));
 
-	sample->core_pct_busy = core_pct;
+	sample->core_pct_busy = (int32_t)core_pct;
 }
 
 static inline void intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/