[PATCH 3.2 16/92] bridge: Handle IFLA_ADDRESS correctly when creating bridge device

[Ben Hutchings]

3.2.60-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 30313a3d5794472c3548d7288e306a5492030370 ]

When bridge device is created with IFLA_ADDRESS, we are not calling
br_stp_change_bridge_id(), which leads to incorrect local fdb
management and bridge id calculation, and prevents us from receiving
frames on the bridge device.

Reported-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
index cbf9ccd..99a48a3 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
@@ -211,11 +211,26 @@ static int br_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int br_dev_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
+			  struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
+{
+	struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
+
+	if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) {
+		spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
+		br_stp_change_bridge_id(br, nla_data(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]));
+		spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
+	}
+
+	return register_netdevice(dev);
+}
+
 struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops __read_mostly = {
 	.kind		= "bridge",
 	.priv_size	= sizeof(struct net_bridge),
 	.setup		= br_dev_setup,
 	.validate	= br_validate,
+	.newlink	= br_dev_newlink,
 	.dellink	= br_dev_delete,
 };
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/