Re: [PATCH 0/3] HWPOISON: improve memory error handling for multithread process

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 30 May 2014 14:24:52 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:25:39PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error handling
> > > on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors, and
> > > patch 3 is for action optional errors.
> > 
> > Naoya,
> > 
> > You suggested early in the discussion (when there were just two patches) that
> > they deserved a "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".  I agreed, and still think the same
> > way.
> 
> Correct. AR error handling was added in v3.2-rc5, so adding
> "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v3.2+" is fine.

I'm not sure that "[PATCH 3/3] mm/memory-failure.c: support dedicated
thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)" is a -stable thing?  That's a
feature addition more than a bugfix?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/