Re: [PATCH] mm: non-atomically mark page accessed during page cache allocation where possible -fix

From: Prabhakar Lad
Date: Thu May 22 2014 - 01:36:16 EST


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 16:49:00 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Prabhakar Lad reported the following problem
>>
>> I see following issue on DA850 evm,
>> git bisect points me to
>> commit id: 975c3a671f11279441006a29a19f55ccc15fb320
>> ( mm: non-atomically mark page accessed during page cache allocation
>> where possible)
>>
>> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 30e03501
>> pgd = c68cc000
>> [30e03501] *pgd=00000000
>> Internal error: Oops: 1 [#1] PREEMPT ARM
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 0 PID: 1015 Comm: network.sh Not tainted 3.15.0-rc5-00323-g975c3a6 #9
>> task: c70c4e00 ti: c73d0000 task.ti: c73d0000
>> PC is at init_page_accessed+0xc/0x24
>> LR is at shmem_write_begin+0x54/0x60
>> pc : [<c0088aa0>] lr : [<c00923e8>] psr: 20000013
>> sp : c73d1d90 ip : c73d1da0 fp : c73d1d9c
>> r10: c73d1dec r9 : 00000000 r8 : 00000000
>> r7 : c73d1e6c r6 : c694d7bc r5 : ffffffe4 r4 : c73d1dec
>> r3 : c73d0000 r2 : 00000001 r1 : 00000000 r0 : 30e03501
>> Flags: nzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
>> Control: 0005317f Table: c68cc000 DAC: 00000015
>> Process network.sh (pid: 1015, stack limit = 0xc73d01c0)
>>
>> pagep is set but not pointing to anywhere valid as it's an uninitialised
>> stack variable. This patch is a fix to
>> mm-non-atomically-mark-page-accessed-during-page-cache-allocation-where-possible.patch
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/filemap.c
>> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
>> @@ -2459,7 +2459,7 @@ ssize_t generic_perform_write(struct file *file,
>> flags |= AOP_FLAG_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
>>
>> do {
>> - struct page *page;
>> + struct page *page = NULL;
>> unsigned long offset; /* Offset into pagecache page */
>> unsigned long bytes; /* Bytes to write to page */
>> size_t copied; /* Bytes copied from user */
>
> Well not really. generic_perform_write() only touches *page if
> ->write_begin() returned "success", which is reasonable behavior.
>
> I'd say you mucked up shmem_write_begin() - it runs
> init_page_accessed() even if shmem_getpage() returned an error. It
> shouldn't be doing that.
>
> This?
>
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: mm/shmem.c: don't run init_page_accessed() against an uninitialised pointer
>
> If shmem_getpage() returned an error then it didn't necessarily initialise
> *pagep. So shmem_write_begin() shouldn't be playing with *pagep in this
> situation.
>
> Fixes an oops when "mm: non-atomically mark page accessed during page
> cache allocation where possible" (quite reasonably) left *pagep
> uninitialized.
>
> Reported-by: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> mm/shmem.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -puN mm/shmem.c~mm-non-atomically-mark-page-accessed-during-page-cache-allocation-where-possiblefix-2 mm/shmem.c
> --- a/mm/shmem.c~mm-non-atomically-mark-page-accessed-during-page-cache-allocation-where-possiblefix-2
> +++ a/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ shmem_write_begin(struct file *file, str
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> ret = shmem_getpage(inode, index, pagep, SGP_WRITE, NULL);
> - if (*pagep)
> + if (ret == 0 && *pagep)
> init_page_accessed(*pagep);
> return ret;
> }

Reported-and-Tested-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad

> _
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/