Re: [PATCH v3] PM / OPP: discard duplicate OPPs

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue May 20 2014 - 08:28:33 EST


On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 05:35:04 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 May 2014 16:56, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > But we aren't talking about failure here. Its not failure. The operation
> > we are trying to do is already done and nothing should break if the
> > OPP was already there or its added now. Its all the same.
>
> Though after more thought into this I feel this must also be done:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> index bdf09f5..3f540d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -453,9 +453,13 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned
> long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
> }
>
> if (new_opp->rate == opp->rate) {
> + int ret = 0;

int ret = new_opp->u_volt == opp->u_volt ? -EEXIST : 0;

would be slightly simpler IMO.

> +
> + if (new_opp->u_volt == opp->u_volt)
> + ret = -EEXIST;
> mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
> kfree(new_opp);
> - return 0;
> + return ret;

> }
>
> list_add_rcu(&new_opp->node, head);


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/