Re: [PATCH 09/10] thermal: exynos: remove redundant pdata checks from exynos_tmu_control()

[Amit Kachhap]

Hi Bartlomiej,
On 5/5/14, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> pdata->reference_voltage and pdata->gain are always defined
> to non-zero values so remove the redundant checks from
> exynos_tmu_control().
I prefer to have these checks for the same reason that new soc support
should not add these same code again.
>
> There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index a8d9524..45d7c6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -215,15 +215,11 @@ static void exynos_tmu_control(struct platform_device
> *pdev, bool on)
>  	if (pdata->test_mux)
>  		con |= (pdata->test_mux << reg->test_mux_addr_shift);
>
> -	if (pdata->reference_voltage) {
> -		con &= ~(reg->buf_vref_sel_mask << reg->buf_vref_sel_shift);
> -		con |= pdata->reference_voltage << reg->buf_vref_sel_shift;
> -	}
> +	con &= ~(reg->buf_vref_sel_mask << reg->buf_vref_sel_shift);
> +	con |= pdata->reference_voltage << reg->buf_vref_sel_shift;
>
> -	if (pdata->gain) {
> -		con &= ~(reg->buf_slope_sel_mask << reg->buf_slope_sel_shift);
> -		con |= (pdata->gain << reg->buf_slope_sel_shift);
> -	}
> +	con &= ~(reg->buf_slope_sel_mask << reg->buf_slope_sel_shift);
> +	con |= (pdata->gain << reg->buf_slope_sel_shift);
>
>  	if (pdata->noise_cancel_mode) {
>  		con &= ~(reg->therm_trip_mode_mask <<
> --
> 1.8.2.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/