Re: [PATCH] mm, hugetlb: move the error handle logic out of normal code path

[Michal Hocko]

On Thu 15-05-14 15:36:20, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2014 11:01:42 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed 14-05-14 15:10:59, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> > > alloc_huge_page() now mixes normal code path with error handle logic.
> > > This patches move out the error handle logic, to make normal code
> > > path more clean and redue code duplicate.
> > 
> > I don't know. Part of the function returns and cleans up on its own and
> > other part relies on clean up labels. This is not so much nicer than the
> > previous state.
> 
> That's actually a common pattern:
> 
> foo()
> {
> 	if (check which doesn't change any state)
> 		return -Efoo;
> 	if (another check which doesn't change any state)
> 		return -Ebar;
> 
> 	do_something_which_changes_state()
> 	
> 	if (another check)
> 		goto undo_that_state_chage;
> 	...
> 
> undo_that_state_change:
> 	...
> }

Right. I have misread the previous vma_needs_reservation and
hugepage_subpool_get_pages error path and already considered it as a
changing state one. Sorry about the confusion.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/