Re: query regarding not returning error if request_irq fails after rtc registration

[Alessandro Zummo]

On Thu, 15 May 2014 22:15:14 +0530
RAGHAVENDRA GANIGA <ravi23ganiga@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> my question is that the set_alarm and alarm_irq_enable is still active,
> so should i use some flag in the global private variable of the driver
> so that if the request irq fails, then using this flag the set_alarm
> and alarm_irq_enable can return error since there is no irq handler
> for the rtc interrupt 
> or is there any other solution 
> or let the set_alarm and alarm_irq_enable routine be as it is and will

 you can use a flag (or set the irq to -1)

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/