Re: [BUG] sched_setattr() SCHED_DEADLINE hangs system

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue May 13 2014 - 06:43:30 EST


On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:57:49AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> static bool
> __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
> {
> return attr && attr->sched_deadline != 0 &&
> (attr->sched_period == 0 ||
> - (s64)(attr->sched_period - attr->sched_deadline) >= 0) &&
> - (s64)(attr->sched_deadline - attr->sched_runtime ) >= 0 &&
> - attr->sched_runtime >= (2 << (DL_SCALE - 1));
> + (attr->sched_period >= attr->sched_deadline)) &&
> + (attr->sched_deadline >= attr->sched_runtime) &&
> + attr->sched_runtime >= (1ULL << DL_SCALE) &&
> + (attr->sched_deadline < (1ULL << 63) &&
> + attr->sched_period < (1ULL << 63));
> }

Could we maybe rewrite that function to look less like a ioccc.org
submission?

static bool
__checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
{
if (!attr) /* possible at all? */
return false;

/* runtime <= deadline <= period */
if (attr->sched_period < attr->sched_deadline ||
attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime)
return false;

/*
* Since we truncate DL_SCALE bits make sure we're at least that big,
* if runtime > (1 << DL_SCALE), so must the others be per the above
*/
if (attr->sched_runtime <= (1ULL << DL_SCALE))
return false;

/*
* Since we use the MSB for wrap-around and sign issues, make
* sure its not set, if period < 2^63, so must the others be.
*/
if (attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63))
return false;

return true;
}

Did I miss anything?

Attachment: pgpVteov_on1i.pgp
Description: PGP signature