Re: [PATCH 20/27] ACPICA: Tables: Fix invalid pointer accesses in acpi_tb_parse_root_table().

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun May 04 2014 - 20:32:26 EST


On Saturday, May 03, 2014 08:59:14 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The commit of back porting Linux XSDT validation mechanism has introduced
> > a regreession:
> > Commit: 671cc68dc61f029d44b43a681356078e02d8dab8
> > Subject: ACPICA: Back port and refine validation of the XSDT root table.
> > There is a pointer still accessed after unmapping.
> >
> > This patch fixes this issue. Lv Zheng.
> >
> > Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73911
> > Buglink: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39811
> > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Bruce Chiarelli <mano155@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Spyros Stathopoulos <spystath@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.14.x: 671cc68: ACPICA: Back port and refine validation of the XSDT root table.
>
> This patch should get into 3.15-rcX soon. It fixes a known regression
> that prevents booting on machines with AMI firmware, and that is
> present in 3.14 so we need it for stable as well. Rafael?

Lv, is it safe to take this patch alone into 3.15-rc?

Rafael


> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c
> > index 6c31d77..e1638ad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c
> > @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ acpi_status __init acpi_tb_parse_root_table(acpi_physical_address rsdp_address)
> > u32 table_count;
> > struct acpi_table_header *table;
> > acpi_physical_address address;
> > + acpi_physical_address rsdt_address;
> > u32 length;
> > u8 *table_entry;
> > acpi_status status;
> > @@ -383,11 +384,14 @@ acpi_status __init acpi_tb_parse_root_table(acpi_physical_address rsdp_address)
> > * as per the ACPI specification.
> > */
> > address = (acpi_physical_address) rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;
> > + rsdt_address =
> > + (acpi_physical_address) rsdp->rsdt_physical_address;
> > table_entry_size = ACPI_XSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > } else {
> > /* Root table is an RSDT (32-bit physical addresses) */
> >
> > address = (acpi_physical_address) rsdp->rsdt_physical_address;
> > + rsdt_address = address;
> > table_entry_size = ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -410,8 +414,7 @@ acpi_status __init acpi_tb_parse_root_table(acpi_physical_address rsdp_address)
> >
> > /* Fall back to the RSDT */
> >
> > - address =
> > - (acpi_physical_address) rsdp->rsdt_physical_address;
> > + address = rsdt_address;
> > table_entry_size = ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 1.7.10
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/