Re: [PATCH 2/7] mfd: cros_ec: spi: Add mutex to cros_ec_spi

From: Simon Glass
Date: Fri Apr 18 2014 - 17:43:40 EST


Hi Doug,

On 18 April 2014 15:15, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Simon,
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > On 17 April 2014 11:59, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> The main transfer function for cros_ec_spi can be called by more than
> >> one client at a time. Make sure that those clients don't stomp on
> >> each other by locking the bus for the duration of the transfer
> >> function.
> >
> > Is there no lock at the cros_ec layer?
>
> Not with what's upstream.
>
> Locally in the Chromium OS tree:
>
> * You can see that Bill removed the dev_lock at
> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/57051/> since it wasn't
> used.
>
> * Andrew moved to a common locking scheme later in
> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/170747/> (thus adding
> roughly the same lock back and using it), but in order to do that
> we've got a dozen pathces in between, some of which are big
> reorganizations. This includes at least:
>
> 6820b91 CHROMIUM: cros_ec: Tweak struct cros_ec_device for clarity
> 5e8e562 CHROMIUM: Use struct cros_ec_command to communicate with the EC
> 9e7db82 CHROMIUM: cleanup: remove unused fields from struct cros_ec_device
> 866e62d CHROMIUM: cleanup: Remove EC wrapper functions.
> 8a372b2 cros_ec: move locking into cros_ec_cmd_xfer
> 981c4aa cros_ec: stop calling ->cmd_xfer() directly
>
> I think we should take in some of those other changes but I'd rather
> get correctness in first (since people are wanting to use this driver
> in upstream kernel) and get cleanups posted after this lands. I was
> also trying not to spam the list with a 20-patch series...

That explains it, thank you. I should have guessed that for myself.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/