Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 changes for 3.15

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Mon Apr 07 2014 - 09:15:49 EST


On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:16:25PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=139523745403081&w=2
>
> I tried applying this patch on top of xfstests commit 3948694eb1, but
> running on ext4.git's test branch, which has the your cross-rename
> patches applied:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/commit/?h=test&id=b7bcc46d4f80139930c2e6bd04ff8ebbff121bc9
>
> I see the following:
>
> BEGIN TEST: Ext4 4k block Fri Apr 4 23:21:50 UTC 2014
> Device: /dev/vdb
> mk2fs options: -q
> mount options: -o block_validity
> FSTYP -- ext4
> PLATFORM -- Linux/i686 candygram 3.14.0-00061-gb7bcc46
> MKFS_OPTIONS -- -q /dev/vdc
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o block_validity /dev/vdc /vdc
>
> generic/323 [23:22:03] [23:22:04] [not run]
> generic/323 -- kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall
> generic/324 [23:22:04] [23:22:05] [not run]
> generic/324 -- kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall
> generic/325 [23:22:05] [23:22:06] [not run]
> generic/325 -- kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall
> Not run: generic/323 generic/324 generic/325
>
> Is there anything obvious that I might be doing wrong?

I only wired up the syscall for x86_64. Who's responsible for adding
all the syscall tables for the various architectures?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/