Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Fri Apr 04 2014 - 12:58:24 EST


On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying
> to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the
> equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches.
>
> I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this
> moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm.

Uh? Did you CC also xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on your patches Peter?
I hadn't had a chance to see or comment on them :-(

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/