Re: [PATCH v2] axs_nand - add driver for NAND controller used on Synopsys AXS dev boards

From: Ezequiel Garcia
Date: Fri Apr 04 2014 - 10:10:20 EST


On Apr 04, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Maybe it would be nice adding some driver description here, so the commit
log actually says something useful about the commit.

[..]
> Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> +/**
> + * axs_flag_wait_and_reset - Waits until requested flag in INT_STATUS register
> + * is set by HW and resets it by writing "1" in INT_CLR_STATUS.
> + * @host: Pointer to private data structure.
> + * @flag: Bit/flag offset in INT_STATUS register
> + */
> +static void axs_flag_wait_and_reset(struct axs_nand_host *host, int flag)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < AXS_FLAG_WAIT_DELAY * 100; i++) {
> + unsigned int status = reg_get(host, INT_STATUS);
> +
> + if (status & (1 << flag)) {
> + reg_set(host, INT_CLR_STATUS, 1 << flag);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + udelay(10);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Since we cannot report this problem any further than
> + * axs_nand_{write|read}_buf() letting user know there's a problem.
> + */
> + dev_err(host->dev, "Waited too long (%d s.) for flag/bit %d\n",
> + AXS_FLAG_WAIT_DELAY, flag);
> +}

Hm... I'm not sure the above is really true.

The NAND core uses the replaceable chip->waitfunc callback to check the
status of issued commands. See for instance:

static int nand_write_oob_std(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
int page)
{
int status = 0;
const uint8_t *buf = chip->oob_poi;
int length = mtd->oobsize;

chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_SEQIN, mtd->writesize, page);
chip->write_buf(mtd, buf, length);
/* Send command to program the OOB data */
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG, -1, -1);

status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);

return status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL ? -EIO : 0;
}

On the other side, if you are clearing the flags in axs_flag_wait_and_reset()
it might be a bit hard for you to get this right.

IOW, I'm not saying you *must* do this, but instead suggesting that you take
a look at waitfunc() and see if it helps report a proper error in the
read/write path.
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/