Re: [GIT PULL v2] timers updates for 3.15

[Ingo Molnar]

* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So I propose you something even more simple. The choice of 
> tip:timers/core as a base was actually just about topic. But there 
> is no dependency on it. (And actually sched/core would have been a 
> better choice for a base if any).
> 
> So in order to fix the conflict and minimize the dependencies, I 
> just rebased the patches on top of tip:core/locking only. No merge 
> on top of that. It seems to work pretty well.
> 
> The pullable result is in sched/cputime on my tree. Let me know if 
> that's ok for you.

Yeah, that sounds excellent. Thomas, you might want to keep this in a 
sparate branch from timers/core though. We still have timers/nohz for 
example.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/