Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking: qspinlock

[Waiman Long]

On 03/12/2014 02:24 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:17:46PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > Except that I do a single atomic short integer write to switch the bits
> > instead of 2 byte write.
> D'0h why didn't I think of that. A single short write is much better
> than the 2 byte writes.
>
> In any case; can you try and keep the structure in this patch-set if you
> post another version? It takes a lot of effort to unravel your
> all-in-one patch.

I didn't have time to fully review and test your changes yet. So I just 
post a new series of what I currently have right now. I will certainly 
do the testing on your patches.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/