Re: [patch 3/8] mm: memcg: inline mem_cgroup_charge_common()

[Johannes Weiner]

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:52:13PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 11-03-14 21:28:29, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -3919,20 +3919,21 @@ out:
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * Charge the memory controller for page usage.
> > - * Return
> > - * 0 if the charge was successful
> > - * < 0 if the cgroup is over its limit
> > - */
> > -static int mem_cgroup_charge_common(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > -				gfp_t gfp_mask, enum charge_type ctype)
> > +int mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(struct page *page,
> > +			      struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> 
> s/mem_cgroup_newpage_charge/mem_cgroup_anon_charge/ ?
> 
> Would be a better name? The patch would be bigger but the name more
> apparent...

I wouldn't be opposed to fixing those names at all, but I think that
is out of the scope of this patch.  Want to send one?

mem_cgroup_charge_anon() would be a good name, but then we should also
rename mem_cgroup_cache_charge() to mem_cgroup_charge_file() to match.

Or charge_private() vs. charge_shared()...

> Other than that I am good with this. Without (preferably) or without
> rename:
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/