Re: [PATCH 3.12 117/133] alpha: fix broken network checksum

From: Mikulas Patocka
Date: Thu Feb 06 2014 - 04:19:03 EST




On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Michael Cree wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 01:08:38PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit 0ef38d70d4118b2ce1a538d14357be5ff9dc2bbd upstream.
> >
> > The patch 3ddc5b46a8e90f3c9251338b60191d0a804b0d92 breaks networking on
> > alpha (there is a follow-up fix 5cfe8f1ba5eebe6f4b6e5858cdb1a5be4f3272a6,
> > but networking is still broken even with the second patch).
>
> I wonder whether that follow-up (partial) fix mentioned
> (5cfe8f1ba5eebe6f4b6e5858cdb1a5be4f3272a6) should be pulled into 3.12 stable
> too?
>
> Cheers
> Michael.

Hi

It is quite confusing - csum_partial_copy_from_user is only called from
csum_and_copy_from_user in include/net/checksum.h.

csum_and_copy_from_user already verifies the source memory range with
access_ok. Despite this, people started to add access_ok to many
architecture-specific versions of csum_partial_copy_from_user (for example
3ddc5b46a8e90f3c9251338b60191d0a804b0d92).

It seems that the best thing is to revert
0ef38d70d4118b2ce1a538d14357be5ff9dc2bbd,
5cfe8f1ba5eebe6f4b6e5858cdb1a5be4f3272a6 and csum_partial_copy_from_user
change from 3ddc5b46a8e90f3c9251338b60191d0a804b0d92.


David, you are maintainer of networking - does it have any deeper sense to
perform access_ok in csum_partial_copy_from_user if the caller performs
this check already? Should this be just removed?

Also - the x86 and alpha implementation of csum_and_copy_from_user zero
the destination buffer on userspace-access error - but
csum_and_copy_from_user (that calls these function) doesn't zero the
destination buffer on error. Should the destination buffer be zeroed on
error or not?

Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/