Re: [PATCH] mm: __set_page_dirty_nobuffers uses spin_lock_irqseveinstead of spin_lock_irq

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> Indeed, good catch.  Do we need the same treatment for
> __set_page_dirty_buffers() that can be called by way of
> clear_page_dirty_for_io()?

Indeed. I posted a patch fixed __set_page_dirty() too. plz see

Subject: [PATCH] __set_page_dirty uses spin_lock_irqsave instead of
spin_lock_irq
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/