Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] x86: make dma_alloc_coherent() return zeroedmemory if CMA is enabled

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Mon Jan 27 2014 - 10:25:32 EST


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 02:54:47PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-01-14 15:13, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> >Calling dma_alloc_coherent() with __GFP_ZERO must return zeroed memory.
> >
> >But when the contiguous memory allocator (CMA) is enabled on x86 and
> >the memory region is allocated by dma_alloc_from_contiguous(), it
> >doesn't return zeroed memory. Because dma_generic_alloc_coherent()
> >forgot to fill the memory region with zero if it was allocated by
> >dma_alloc_from_contiguous()
>
> I just wonder how it will work with high mem? I've didn't check the x86
> dma mapping code yet, but page_address() works only for pages, which comes
> from low memory. In other patches you have added an option to place CMA
> area anywhere in the memory. Is the x86 pci dma code ready for the case
> when cma area is put into high mem and direct mappings are not available?

Yes and no. The swiotbl_bounce does have the code to take that into account.
But that is it - nothing else does - so I think you would run in the
possiblity of 'page_address' not providing an correct virtual address.

>
> >Most implementations of dma_alloc_coherent() return zeroed memory
> >regardless of whether __GFP_ZERO is specified. So this fixes it by
> >unconditionally zeroing the allocated memory region.
> >
> >Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Cc: iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >New patch from this version
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> >index 872079a..9644405 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> >@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ void *dma_generic_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> > dma_mask = dma_alloc_coherent_mask(dev, flag);
> >- flag |= __GFP_ZERO;
> > again:
> > page = NULL;
> > if (!(flag & GFP_ATOMIC))
> >@@ -118,7 +117,7 @@ again:
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >-
> >+ memset(page_address(page), 0, size);
> > *dma_addr = addr;
> > return page_address(page);
> > }
>
> Best regards
> --
> Marek Szyprowski, PhD
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/