Re: [RFC] subreaper mode 2 (Re: A feature suggestion for sandboxing processes)

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Victor Porton <porton@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't quite understand your subreaper mode 2, but for me it looks like that this would break compatibility (sandboxed applications ideally should not be written in any special way, any application which does not open new files (or does similar things) should work in sandbox just like as if there would be no sandbox).

I'm suggesting that *sandbox*, not the application in the sandbox, use
subreaper mode 2 (or whatever the new mechanism).  The sandboxed app
should case, except insofar as as the sandbox can't double-fork to
create long-lived subprocesses.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/