Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: fix memleak on probe error

From: Martin Mokrejs
Date: Mon Dec 23 2013 - 06:00:25 EST


Thanks for the note, was just compiling a new 3.10.24 kernel to test it.
;-)

So far just booted an old 3.9 kernel and after plugging in an external
USB3 drive I got the message, just to be sure I am still able to reproduce
the error and that I have the right .config in the running kernel.

Will wait for another fix instead.
Martin

Peter Wu wrote:
Nevermind this patch, it does not really fix the memleak because
i2c_set_adapdata() calls dev_set_drvdata() which allocates memory.
(I must have ran kmemleak too early, right after boot it did not
give any warnings, now it does).

RFC: what about dropping i2c_set_adapdata() from the probe function
and replacing i2c_get_adapdata(adapter) by
pci_get_drvdata(adapter->pci_dev) on top of this patch? I am not
sure what the purpose is for i2c_set_adapdata, hence this question.

Regards,
Peter

On Monday 23 December 2013 10:39:38 Peter Wu wrote:
The driver-specific data for i801 was only set for the device on
success, that led to a memory leak on error paths (for instance, when
there is a resource conflict with ACPI). (The driver core clears the
driver data (if set) if the probe routine fails).

Fix it by setting the driver data right after successful memory
allocation, before reaching any error paths.

References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/23/191
Reported-by: Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@xxxxxxxxx> [ACPI conflict error path]
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Jean,

This memleak issue is still present in v3.13-rc4-256-gb7000ad.
From kmemleak:

unreferenced object 0xffff88022f501a00 (size 256):
comm "systemd-udevd", pid 209, jiffies 4294896115 (age 2872.520s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N..........
ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff f4 e2 53 82 ff ff ff ff ..........S.....
backtrace:
[<ffffffff815d29ce>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4e/0xb0
[<ffffffff8116ea5a>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xfa/0x1e0
[<ffffffff813efc63>] device_private_init+0x23/0x80
[<ffffffff813f2b49>] dev_set_drvdata+0x39/0x50
[<ffffffffa0294539>] i801_probe+0x59/0x528 [i2c_i801]
[<ffffffff81332d95>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
[<ffffffff81333be9>] pci_device_probe+0xd9/0x130
[<ffffffff813f30e7>] driver_probe_device+0x87/0x390
[<ffffffff813f34c3>] __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
[<ffffffff813f102b>] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0
[<ffffffff813f2b0e>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff813f26e8>] bus_add_driver+0x188/0x260
[<ffffffff813f3b04>] driver_register+0x64/0xf0
[<ffffffff81332930>] __pci_register_driver+0x60/0x70
[<ffffffffa02990af>] 0xffffffffa02990af
[<ffffffff81000312>] do_one_initcall+0xf2/0x1a0

The dmesg for this laptop also contains a resource conflict message,
just like the reporter (Martin Mokrejs):

[ 15.409772] ACPI Warning: 0x0000000000001840-0x000000000000185f SystemIO conflicts with Region \_SB_.PCI0.SBUS.SMBI 1 (20131115/utaddress-251)
[ 15.413439] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver

With this patch applied on top of almost 3.13-rc5 (v3.13-rc4-256-gb7000ad),
the memleak is gone.

Regards,
Peter
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
index 737e298..a7096bf 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
@@ -1117,6 +1117,7 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
if (!priv)
return -ENOMEM;

+ pci_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
i2c_set_adapdata(&priv->adapter, priv);
priv->adapter.owner = THIS_MODULE;
priv->adapter.class = i801_get_adapter_class(priv);
@@ -1236,8 +1237,6 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
/* We ignore errors - multiplexing is optional */
i801_add_mux(priv);

- pci_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
-
return 0;

exit_free_irq:



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/