Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: anatop-regulator: Remove unneeded check

[Shawn Guo]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:42:09AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> At the 'anatop_probe_end' error path, the variable 'ret' is known to be
> non-zero, so there is no need to check it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
> index c734d09..0a3597b 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
> @@ -211,8 +211,7 @@ static int anatop_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rdev);
>  
>  anatop_probe_end:
> -	if (ret)
> -		kfree(sreg->name);
> +	kfree(sreg->name);

NAK

With the change, a successful probe will end up with calling this
kfree() as well.

Shawn

>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/