Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] Support timezone of ACPI TAD and EFI TIME

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 12/19/2013 08:05 PM, joeyli wrote:
> 
> Then that means the priority of PNP0B0x is higher then "CMOS RTC Not
> Present" flag. ACPI spec doesn't have clear definition on this.
> 

According to the Microsoft requirements documents, such a platform is
broken and shouldn't exist.

> I look forward to Borislav's "EFI runtime mapping" to fix the physical
> address accessing issue of EFI time service on x86_64 machines. I tested
> his patches on a issue machine and it works for walk around BIOS bug.
> 
> Can we use EFI time services on x86_64 after Borislav's patches accepted
> to mainline?
> 

No.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/