Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: add clk accuracy retrieval support

[boris brezillon]

Le 19/12/2013 20:36, Mike Turquette a Ãcrit :
> Quoting boris brezillon (2013-12-19 00:54:07)
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > On 19/12/2013 07:04, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > Quoting Boris BREZILLON (2013-12-17 06:36:22)
> > > > +unsigned long __clk_get_accuracy(struct clk *clk)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       unsigned long ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (!clk)
> > > > +               return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +       return clk->accuracy;
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clk_get_accuracy);
> > > Any reason for exporting this?
> > This might be used by clk drivers to choose the most accurate clk
> > among its parent clks (within the determinate_rate callback).
> >
> > And as some clk drivers might be compiled as modules we need
> > to export the symbol (__clk_get_name helper function is exported
> > too).
> Does your driver need this or is this just following the existing
> __clk_get_rate / clk_get_rate model?

No, I don't need this for my driver, at least for the moment.

Do you want me to drop this EXPORT_SYMBOL ?
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Boris
> > > Regards,
> > > Mike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/