[PATCH 3.12 062/118] drm/i915: use the correct force_wake function at the PC8 code

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>

commit a1216444283e81fd904593a4a77c90adfe5d14d1 upstream.

When I submitted the first patch adding these force wake functions,
Chris Wilson observed that I was using the wrong functions, so I sent
a second version of the patch to correct this problem. The problem is
that v1 was merged instead of v2.

I was able to notice the problem when running the
debugfs-forcewake-user subtest of pm_pc8 from intel-gpu-tools.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -6062,7 +6062,7 @@ void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_p
 
 	/* Make sure we're not on PC8 state before disabling PC8, otherwise
 	 * we'll hang the machine! */
-	dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv);
+	gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv);
 
 	if (val & LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW) {
 		val &= ~LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW;
@@ -6093,7 +6093,7 @@ void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_p
 			DRM_ERROR("Switching back to LCPLL failed\n");
 	}
 
-	dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put(dev_priv);
+	gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv);
 }
 
 void hsw_enable_pc8_work(struct work_struct *__work)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/