Re: [PATCH 1/2] memcg: fix memcg_size() calculation

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Mon Dec 16 2013 - 11:47:36 EST


On Sat 14-12-13 12:15:33, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> The mem_cgroup structure contains nr_node_ids pointers to
> mem_cgroup_per_node objects, not the objects themselves.

Ouch! This is 2k per node which is wasted. What a shame I haven't
noticed this back then when reviewing 45cf7ebd5a033 (memcg: reduce the
size of struct memcg 244-fold)

> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index bf5e894..7f1a356 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> static size_t memcg_size(void)
> {
> return sizeof(struct mem_cgroup) +
> - nr_node_ids * sizeof(struct mem_cgroup_per_node);
> + nr_node_ids * sizeof(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *);
> }
>
> /* internal only representation about the status of kmem accounting. */
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/