Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra20 cpufreq driver

From: bilhuang
Date: Mon Dec 16 2013 - 05:52:18 EST


On 12/14/2013 07:21 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 12/12/2013 02:33 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
Re-model Tegra20 cpufreq driver as below.

* Rename tegra-cpufreq.c to tegra20-cpufreq.c since this file supports
only Tegra20.
* Add probe function so defer probe can be used when we're going to
support DVFS.
* Create a fake cpufreq platform device with its name being
"${root_compatible}-cpufreq" so SoC cpufreq driver can bind to it
accordingly.

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm

+config ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ
+ bool "NVIDIA TEGRA20"
+ depends on ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ && ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
+ default y
+ help
+ This enables Tegra20 cpufreq functionality, it adds
+ Tegra20 CPU frequency ladder and the call back functions
+ to set CPU rate. All the non-SoC dependant codes are
+ controlled by the config ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ.

I think that last sentence is no longer true in this patch version. Or,
did you mean to write ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ rather than ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ?

Right, should be ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ, thanks for catching this.

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c

+static const char * const tegra_soc_compat[] = {
+ "nvidia,tegra124",
+ "nvidia,tegra114",
+ "nvidia,tegra30",
+ "nvidia,tegra20",
+ NULL
};

That table will need editing for each chip. I wonder if you can do
something like always use the very last entry in /compatible. That would
assume a particular ordering of the compatible entries, but they should
be in the order $board, $soc anyway...

How do we get subset of a string and making sure it is the last? There must be some assumptions here (though they will possibly be true) I guess, for example, they should be in the order $board, $soc... and the last "nvidia" should be the start of the last compatible id we would like to get.

+int __init tegra_cpufreq_init(void)
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra_soc_compat); i++) {
+ if (of_machine_is_compatible(tegra_soc_compat[i])) {
+ struct platform_device_info devinfo;
+ char buf[40];
+
+ memset(&devinfo, 0, sizeof(devinfo));
+ strcpy(buf, tegra_soc_compat[i]);
+ strcat(buf, "-cpufreq");

kasprintf() might be simpler, and would avoid the arbitrary 39-character
string limit and possibility of overflow.

Ah yeah, thanks.

+ devinfo.name = buf;
+ platform_device_register_full(&devinfo);

Does the devinfo struct need to stick around, i.e. does
platform_device_register_full keep the pointer, or take a copy of the
struct? If it keeps the pointer, it'd be best to make devinfo a static
global variable.

devinfo is used to provide dev info to create platform device structure, so I think it is OK here.

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c

Please pass the "-C" option to "git format-patch"; I assume that almost
all the code in this file is simply cut/paste verbatim from
tegra-cpufreq.c where it was deleted.

OK, thanks.

+ * Copyright (C) 2010 Google, Inc.

It's worth adding NV (c) here too.

OK.

+static int tegra20_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ cpufreq_unregister_driver(&tegra20_cpufreq_driver);
+ return 0;
+}

That leaks all the clk_get_sys() calls. Does building this as a module
work OK?

I should add back those clk_put here.

+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

That should be "GPL v2".

OK.

diff --git a/include/linux/tegra-cpufreq.h b/include/linux/tegra-cpufreq.h

+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ
+int tegra_cpufreq_init(void);
+#else
+static inline int tegra_cpufreq_init(void)
+{ return; }
+#endif

If you're going to wrap the { } onto one line, then I think it'd be best
to wrap the whole thing (prototype and body) onto one line. Otherwise,
write:

{
return;
}

Oh, and you need "return 0" not just "return".

Thanks for catching.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/