Re: [PATCH 1/9] Known exploit detection

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 07:25:23PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:13:41PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
>  > - who will keep adding these triggers going forward?
> 
> also..
> 
> - Who will test the existing triggers are doing the right thing when related code changes.

And:
  - how do you determine an "expoit attempt" from "userspace program
    doing something stupid" / "corrupted filesytem mounted"?

I really don't like this, it means that our normal error handling for
userspace data will suddenly all have CVE entries on them over time.
How is that helpful to anyone?

Think ahead in 10-20 years, what is the code paths going to look like
then?  Horrible...

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/