Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Switch to sched_clock_register()

[Stephen Boyd]

On 11/20/13 10:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/17/13 12:27, Max Filippov wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The 32 bit sched_clock interface now supports 64 bits. Upgrade
>>> to the 64 bit function to allow us to remove the 32 bit
>>> registration interface.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Patch is based on Linus' tip. Not event compile tested.
>>>
>>>  arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> Build and run-tested, appears to work.
>> Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Should it go through xtensa tree, or through some other tree as a part
>> of a bigger conversion series?
> If it can go through xtensa that sounds like the best option. Otherwise
> we can send it through the tip/timers tree.
>

Ping? I don't see this patch in linux-next yet so should I send this
through the tip/timers tree?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/