[PATCH -next 4/4] debugfs: Fix misuse of seq_printf return value

From: Joe Perches
Date: Thu Dec 12 2013 - 18:48:26 EST


Adding repeated -1 to the return is not correct.

Use seq_is_buf_full to test for unnecessary seq_printf uses
and always return 0.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/debugfs/file.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/debugfs/file.c b/fs/debugfs/file.c
index 6314629..da65fed 100644
--- a/fs/debugfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/debugfs/file.c
@@ -695,15 +695,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_create_u32_array);
int debugfs_print_regs32(struct seq_file *s, const struct debugfs_reg32 *regs,
int nregs, void __iomem *base, char *prefix)
{
- int i, ret = 0;
+ int i;

for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++, regs++) {
- if (prefix)
- ret += seq_printf(s, "%s", prefix);
- ret += seq_printf(s, "%s = 0x%08x\n", regs->name,
- readl(base + regs->offset));
+ seq_printf(s, "%s%s = 0x%08x\n",
+ prefix ? prefix : "",
+ regs->name, readl(base + regs->offset));
+ if (seq_is_buf_full(s))
+ break;
}
- return ret;
+
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_print_regs32);

--
1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/