Re: [PATCH] libata: provide the ability to disable a disk via theparams.

[Robin H. Johnson]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:36:55PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> > 2. One of my friends wondered if it would be worthwhile to add force
> > keywords for other HORKAGE bits, and if so, should the
> > ata_lflag/ata_link force bits also be presented?
> I don't think so. Most of the other HORKAGEs are automatically
> recognized and applied by the code. I think the only ones
> which can cause trouble if not detected at first are the ones that are
> currently in the list.
His logic was thinking that it will aid debugging/testing on new buggy
devices if the options are available at boot.

I'd think of the following as candidates for that:
ATA_HORKAGE_NODMA
ATA_HORKAGE_MAX_SEC_128
ATA_HORKAGE_DIAGNOSTIC
ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA
ATA_HORKAGE_DISABLE
ATA_HORKAGE_HPA_SIZE
ATA_HORKAGE_IVB
ATA_HORKAGE_STUCK_ERR (only set by code presently, not by blacklist)
ATA_HORKAGE_BRIDGE_OK
ATA_HORKAGE_ATAPI_MOD16_DMA
ATA_HORKAGE_NOSETXFER
ATA_HORKAGE_MAX_SEC_LBA48

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail     : robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx
GnuPG FP   : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/