Re: [Query] Ticks happen in pair for NO_HZ_FULL cores ?

[Tejun Heo]

Hey, guys.

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 02:22:14PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> I fear I don't understand your question. Do you mean why don't we prevent from
> that bdi writeback work to run when we are in full dynticks mode?
> 
> We can't just ignore workqueues and timers callback when they are scheduled
> otherwise the kernel is going to behave randomly.
> 
> OTOH what we can do is to work on these per cpu workqueues and timers and do
> what's necessary to avoid them to fire, as explained in detail there Documentation/kernel-per-CPU-kthreads.txt

Hmmm... some per-cpu workqueues can be turned into unbound ones and
the writeback is one of those.  Currently, this is used for
powersaving on mobile but could also be useful for jitter control.  In
the long term, it could be beneficial to strictly distinguish the
workqueues which really need per-cpu behavior and the ones which are
per-cpu just for optimization.

> There is also the problem of unbound workqueues for which we don't
> have a solution yet. But the idea is that we could tweak their
> affinity from sysfs.

Yes, this is a long term todo item but I'm currently a bit too swamped
to tackle it myself.  cc'ing Lai, who has pretty good knowledge of
workqueue internals, and Bandan, who seemed interested in working on
implementing default attrs.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/