Re: [merged]mm-memcg-handle-non-error-oom-situations-more-gracefully.patch removed from-mm tree

[Johannes Weiner]

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:12:55AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 27-11-13 18:33:53, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 13b9d0f..5f9e467 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -2675,7 +2675,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >  		goto bypass;
> >  
> >  	if (unlikely(task_in_memcg_oom(current)))
> > -		goto bypass;
> > +		goto nomem;
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * We always charge the cgroup the mm_struct belongs to.
> 
> Yes, I think we really want this. Plan to send a patch? The first charge
> failure due to OOM shouldn't be papered over by a later attempt if we
> didn't get through mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize yet.

Sure thing.  Will send this to Andrew on Monday.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/