Re: [PATCH V2] n_gsm: race between ld close and gsmtty open

[channing]

On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 19:16 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > 
> > > What is different from the previous version?  That information needs to
> > > be somewhere, otherwise I'm just going to guess and say this is the same
> > > as your last one, which was incorrect.
> > The difference with previous one is to use a mutex instead of spin lock
> > to avoid race, purpose is to avoid sleep in atomic context. I've also
> > updated commit a little as above.
> 
> Then be explicit as to what has changed somewhere.  We deal with
> thousands of patches a week, we can not know that you changed one
> sentance in a patch description of a few hundred lines long to know you
> made a change to the patch itself as well...
OK, in next patch set, I'll highlight difference with previous patch
set.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/